GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2002-03 > 1016756120


From: "D. Spencer Hines" <>
Subject: Re: Plantagenet Descents From Ancient Judea
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:15:20 -0000
References: <3C997667.8080805@interfold.com>, <20020321233928.12939.qmail@web13304.mail.yahoo.com>


Hilarious!

Arthur, alias Bronwen, follows up with a Determined Defense for
Continued Flakiness.

It's interesting to see the sort of mush with which she fills her
students' heads ---- so starkly revealed, right here on SGM.

Flakey Teachers Produce Flakey Graduates ---- And The U.S. Is Overrun
With Them.

Quod Erat Demonstrandum.

Arthur/Bronwen needs to take a Basic Thinking 101 course, ASAP.

Deus Vult.

"One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe things like that: no
ordinary man could be such a fool."

George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair) [1903-1950] ---- _Notes on
Nationalism_, May, 1945

All replies to the newsgroup please. Thank you kindly.

All original material contained herein is copyright and property of the
author. It may be quoted only in discussions on this forum and with an
attribution to the author, unless permission is otherwise expressly
given, in writing.
---------

D. Spencer Hines

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Vires et Honor.

"Arthur Murata" <> wrote in message
news:...

| I still think that so long as everyone, including the
| speaker or poster, is clear about what is speculative and
| what is evidence-driven and open for interpretation, there
| is no harm done in brainstorming. Perhaps genealogy is
| different than other social sciences - actually I guess
| that's pretty obvious - in that participants have every
| conceivable degree of education and ability when they
| communicate with one another in the news group. I come out
| of the social sciences but I am not a specialist in
| genealogy. I do insist that my students brainstorm and then
| gather evidence to *test* the *questions* (not answers)
| that arose from the brainstorming. I do indeed caution them
| to look at as many different perspectives as they can find
| and not narrow their focus to those which fit their
| hypothesis. And I do grade their papers strictly,
| emphasizing the use of source materials.
|
| We are speaking, I think, of process, not product. And
| perhaps we will have to agree to disagree about how that
| process can develop. Perhaps it is a matter of the
| personality of the researcher - left brain, right brain,
| guy thing, girl thing, whatever. And now prepare yourself -
| I'm going to use a word that will make you very unhappy -
| there are some people whose *intuition* may lead them to
| the evidence that will provide the sources needed to test
| (not necessarily support) their original hypothesis. Thank
| you for your courteous reply. Respectfully, Bronwen Edwards



This thread: