GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2002-07 > 1025557587


From: "Sarah Reveley" <>
Subject: questionable marriage
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 16:09:03 -0500
References: <61.21ed2561.2a5062e7@aol.com> <0e6001c22058$2f324630$8f15bcd0@computer> <001401c22093$40bb6720$ff8cfea9@computer> <0f6101c2209d$9ca68bf0$8f15bcd0@computer> <3D1FB5A6.249ADE6F@pacbell.net> <065f01c220ac$d5d89580$bc9c5a42@computer> <3D207089.1E56209B@pacbell.net>


>> Especially from someone who mentions a marriage to a
person whose very existence is questionable. :-)<<
Kay Allen

Now that was downright tacky, Honey. Glad you added a smiley face, or I would have to bust you in the nose. ;-)

I have noticed that there are continuous disagreements on this List, which is very helpful and often entertaining in getting to the truth about details. I see no reason to make disparaging remarks about other researchers. We are all here for the same reason, a love of genealogy, and our family history.

Rudeness is unacceptable.

Regards,
Sarah


This thread: