GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2002-07 > 1025714303


From: "Sarah Reveley" <>
Subject: Re: New PA Line to Jane Lowe
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 11:40:52 -0500
References: <61.21ed2561.2a5062e7@aol.com> <0e6001c22058$2f324630$8f15bcd0@computer> <001401c22093$40bb6720$ff8cfea9@computer> <0f6101c2209d$9ca68bf0$8f15bcd0@computer> <3D1FB5A6.249ADE6F@pacbell.net> <101501c220a5$03f44cf0$8f15bcd0@computer> <000601c220c4$5e041580$ff8cfea9@computer> <118301c220c5$1dd6fcb0$8f15bcd0@computer>


Dear Carl Boyer III,

Are you out there somewhere? Let's get this resolved once and for all. Just look at the trouble you got me in (okay okay so I got myself in). Looks like you may have to issue a revised version.

Next time, check with the List before you go to press.

Regards,
Sarah
----- Original Message -----
From: malinda
To:
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: New PA Line to Jane Lowe


From Learned Cousin....



My reference showed the Camvilles were not related, however, I am open to
learning otherwise. That excellent genealogist and compiler, Carl Boyer, 3rd
who published "Medieval English Ancesters of Certain Americans" in 2001,
made the statement he was unable to find a relationship, so I did not look
any further, as it was getting late in the day.

Now that I am looking for Camvilles, I am finding them all over the place!
I have data on the Vernons as well. Sorry about that!

Now tell me if there is something I might add to what you have.

J.






This thread: