GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2002-07 > 1027810001


From: "Ian Fettes" <>
Subject: Re: John de Bohun m 1325 Alice de Arundel
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 08:46:41 +1000
References: <16c.11331eb2.2a740af6@aol.com>


John & Adrian,

p 381 of CP Vol XIV does qualify the line 1 correction. It says 'Isobel,
sister'. That makes it clear that Isobel was the sister of Jacques and
therefore correctly the daughter of Nicholas as per the correction for line
2.

Ian Fettes
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Replyto:


---- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, 28 July 2002 0:40
Subject: Re: John de Bohun m 1325 Alice de Arundel


> Saturday, 27 July, 2002
>
>
> Dear Adrian, et al.,
>
> This would appear to be another example requiring Corrections to
> Corrections to CP (Volume XV, maybe ?).
>
> I show the Conde connection as:
>
>
> Nicholas de Conde = Isabel [Elizabeth] de Morialme
> ______________I
> I
> I Eustache III = Marie de
> I de Roeulx I Mortaigne
> I __________________I
> I I
> Jacques de Conde = Agnes de Roeulx
> I
> I Guillaume de = Agnes de
> I Fiennes I Dammartin
> I I
> I I
> ________ de Conde = Enguerrand de
> (Possibly Isabel ?) I Fiennes
> I
> Maud de Fiennes
>
>
> The problematic change in CP Vol XIV, p. 381 should say
>
> 'SON of Nicholas I..........'
>
> Instead of 'da.' : it was an elaboration on the parentage of Jacques
de
> Conde.
>
> Hope this helps. Meanwhile, good luck, and good hunting.
>
> John *
>
>
> * John P. Ravilious
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________


This thread: