GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2002-07 > 1027873970


From: Kay Allen AG <>
Subject: Re: John de Bohun m 1325 Alice de Arundel
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 09:42:44 -0700
References: <90.29821a38.2a755960@aol.com>


This is also what I found in G. mAndrews Moriarty's Notebooks.

K

wrote:

> Sunday, 28 July, 2002
>
> Dear Ian and Adrian,
>
> Thanks for the cites from CP XIV.
>
> While that appears to destroy the du Roeulx descent, now there is another
> line (derived from the same sources, esp. Steven van Impe's post) from the
> Counts of Hainaut about which I am uncertain. To-wit:
>
> 1. Baldwin II, Count of Hainaut = Ida of Louvain
>
> 1. Baldwin III
> 2. Arnulf du Roeulx
> 3. Alix of Hainaut = Nicholas II, sgr de Rumigny
>
> 1. Beatrice de Rumigny = Gossuin III, sgr de Mons
>
> 1. Alice de Mons = Roger, sgr de Conde
>
> 1. Nicholas de Conde = Isobel de
> Morialme
>
> 1. Jacques de Conde
> 2. Isabel de Conde = Enguerrand de
> Fiennes
>
> Chronogically, this works (looking overall from Baldwin II down to
> William de Fiennes of Wendover, Bucks.).
>
> Is this supported in ES, or elsewhere?
>
> Thanks again; good luck, and good hunting.
>
> John *
>
> * John P. Ravilious
>
>


This thread: