GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives
Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2002-12 > 1038943730
From: Tim Powys-Lybbe <>
Subject: Re: Murder most Foul
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 19:28:50 GMT
References: <006201c29ad7$a39089c0$063cfea9@old>
In-Reply-To: <006201c29ad7$a39089c0$063cfea9@old>
In message <006201c29ad7$a39089c0$>
"Leo van de Pas" <> wrote:
> I am looking at the ancestors (again) of Prince William of Wales and am
> amazed at how many of his ancestors died a violent death. An intriguing
> question arose, what is the difference between murdered, assassinated
> and killed?
Is not all deliberate death a violence against others? So not much
difference.
>
> Here are some, those killed in battle have been excluded as there just
> too many of those:
10th century: 3
11th century: 22
12th century: 16
13th century: 26
14th century: 25
15th century: 32
16th century: 29
17th century: 6
18th century: 3
19th century: 2
20th century: 2
Obviously there are a few omissions, but these figures show how violent
the medieval times were. Perhaps they point out eloquently the supposed
boundary of this newsgroup?
And I don't think there were much difference with P. Wm.'s ancestors; it
is just that we know more of his than most other people's.
--
Tim Powys-Lybbe
For a patchwork of bygones: http://powys.org
This thread:
| Re: Murder most Foul by Tim Powys-Lybbe <> |