GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

From: Rick Eaton <>
Subject: Re: Lacies and Talbots
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 17:27:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <000001c32577$cce80700$1a690044@tu.ok.cox.net>

Spelling?

In American English, at least, the plural of Lacy is Lacys and not Lacies.

Is that true of British English as well, or does the subject line correctly
reflect UK usage?

Just wondering.

Rick

This thread:

• Lacies and Talbots by Tim Powys-Lybbe <>
  • Re: Lacies and Talbots by "Chris Phillips" <>
    • Re: Lacies and Talbots by Tim Powys-Lybbe <>
      • Re: Lacies and Talbots by Cristopher Nash <c@windsong.u-net.com>
  • Re: Lacies and Talbots by Cristopher Nash <c@windsong.u-net.com>
  • RE: Lacies and Talbots by "Phil Moody" <>
    • Re: Lacies and Talbots by "Chris Phillips" <>
  • Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law by Louis Epstein <>
    • Re: Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law by Louis Epstein <>
    • Re: Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law by "Betty Owen" <>
    • Re: Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law by "Sutliff" <>
    • Re: Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law by (Igor Sklar)
      • Re: Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law by (Igor Sklar)
        • Re: Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law (mitochondrial DNA) by Christina <>
        • Re: Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law by (Janko Pavsic)
    • RE: Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law by "Hal Bradley" <>
      • RE: Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law by "Phil Moody" <>
    • Re: Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law by (sofa)
    • Re: Edward Atheling's Father-in-Law by (Jas Grimaldi)
  • RE: Lacies and Talbots by "Phil Moody" <>
  • Lacies and Talbots by Linda Jack <>
    • RE: Lacies and Talbots by "Phil Moody" <>
  • Re: Lacies and Talbots by "Patricia Junkin" <>

  • Re: Lacies and Talbots by Rick Eaton <>