GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

From: "Pierre Aronax" <>
Subject: Re: Medieval genealogy origins compared with written contemporary documents and archaeological evidence.
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:11:23 +0200
References: <000401c35665$5d21fce0$0d45f8c1@AnnieMobileUnit> <010901c356b3$d8772ed0$25a5869f@janeteavhviak4> <3f29543b.118580365@news.mindspring.com> <3F50E6B8.7070106@dcn.org> <3F4ECB0C.3030707@interfold.com> <3F56118E.9090702@dcn.org> <3F56BE33.6080502@interfold.com>

"Todd A. Farmerie" <> a crit dans le message de
news:...

<...>
> If I didn't want to defend the pedigree, I should
> not post irrelevancies.

Well said. I admire your tenacity.

Pierre

This thread:

• Re: Medieval genealogy origins compared with written contemporarydocuments and archaeological evidence. by "Chris & Tom Tinney, Sr." <>
  • Re: Medieval genealogy origins compared with written contemporary documents and archaeological evidence. by "Todd A. Farmerie" <>

    • Re: Medieval genealogy origins compared with written contemporary documents and archaeological evidence. by "Pierre Aronax" <>

    • Re: Medieval genealogy origins compared with written contemporary documents and archaeological evidence. by Francisco Antonio Doria <>
    • Re: Medieval genealogy origins compared with written contemporarydocuments and archaeological evidence. by "Chris & Tom Tinney, Sr." <>
      • Re: Medieval genealogy origins compared with written contemporary documents and archaeological evidence. by "Pierre Aronax" <>