GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2004-07 > 1090007886


From: "Bob Turcott" <>
Subject: Re: Jesus
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 19:58:09 +0000


johnson,

what standards and guidelines are you using to make such referances to
invalidation.
As far as I can see, you have not made one referance to backup your opinions
or views,
so credibilty comes to mind here as far as I can see..


>From:
>To:
>Subject: Re: Jesus
>Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:50:07 -0400
>
>Which of course immediately invalidates all early Christian writings as
>well.
>Will
>
>In a message dated 7/16/2004 11:41:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> writes:
>
> >
> >In a message dated 7/16/2004 9:34:14 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> > writes:
> >
> >Leaving aside the question of what "ancient" means, Will is certainly
> >right as opposed to Jared's simplistic "Nope" - Islam is doucmented in
> >the Quran, and moreover oral tradition is not to be lightly dismissed in
> >the Arab world, where by rigorous standards of comparison this has been
> >more consistently & securely practiced as the basis of education than
> >almost anywhere else in the world.
> >
> >Peter Stewart
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >The Koran is a tome which was written to further the progress of Islam.
>As
> >such it cannot be considered to be "documentation" of Islam. It is
>merely
> >Islamic propaganda. No book constructed by the religion it is promoting
>should
> >ever be accepted as "proof" of anything what so ever.
> >
> >Gordon Hale
> >Grand Prairie, Texas
> >
> >
>



This thread: