GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2004-11 > 1101322298


From: Nathaniel Taylor <>
Subject: Re: FW: Edward Farmer: Proposed GARD
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:51:38 GMT
References: <44720485.727547C2.007FA2F6@aol.com> <JNEBIPBDPPDCGBKMKHOGCEIHENAA.kirkemo@comcast.net> <nathanieltaylor-27D0CE.09353324112004@news1.east.earthlink.net> <942d5b80.0411241039.4842fe9e@posting.google.com>


In article <>,
(John Brandon) wrote:

> Nathaniel Taylor <> wrote in message news:
>
> > third item here--an English deed of 1683 referencing these Farmers--if
> > the document itself states or clearly implies that some of those
> > referred to are in New England, would provide a simple proof of the
> > relationship.
>
> I just checked: one of the many footnotes at the bottom of this Farmer
> pedigree (John Nichols' _Leicestershire_, vol. 4, part 2) clearly
> states that the 1683 document says that Isabella Farmer is "now in New
> England."

That looks good to me, but it should all be written up concisely and
well. Now, on to the next point: is the ancestry that Gordon K. posted
valid?

Nat Taylor

a genealogist's sketchbook:
http://home.earthlink.net/~nathanieltaylor/leaves/

This thread: