GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone?
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:26:19 EST

The British press have no other news, the Tsunami is now 'passé' as far as
the media is concerned, British politics is 'sterile' - so why not bash another
institution that merits to be put to pasture anyway. Vive la République!

P-G (peter de loriol)

This thread:

• British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "William Black" <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "tiglath" <>
      • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Julian Richards <>
      • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Matthew Harley <>
        • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "tiglath" <>
      • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by
        • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by (The Rev**d)
        • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "a.spencer3" <>
          • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Renia <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "tiglath" <>
  • RE: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "Ginny Wagner" <>
    • RE: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
      • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by
        • RE: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "Ginny Wagner" <>
          • RE: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Tim Powys-Lybbe <>
          • RE: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "JOY ROBBINS" <>
            • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by
          • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Roger LeBlanc <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Julian Richards <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Doug McDonald <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
      • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Renia <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "tiglath" <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Renia <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Roger LeBlanc <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "CED" <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by adamadamant <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Renia <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Renia <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "tiglath" <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "tiglath" <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "tiglath" <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Michael W Cook <>
      • Speaking for victims of Nazism [was: Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone?] by "Peter Stewart" <>
        • Re: Speaking for victims of Nazism [was: Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone?] by "Barrie J. Wright" <>
          • Re: Speaking for victims of Nazism [was: Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone?] by "Peter Stewart" <>
            • Re: Speaking for victims of Nazism [was: Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone?] by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
          • the history lesson ----- a little off the subject by "Betty Owen" <>
            • Re: the history lesson ----- a little off the subject by
              • Re: the history lesson ----- a little off the subject by "Betty Owen" <>
                • Re: the history lesson ----- a little off the subject by "John Steele Gordon" <>
                  • Re: The History Lesson -- A Little Off The Subject by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
                  • Re: the history lesson ----- a little off the subject by
                • Re: the history lesson ----- a little off the subject by
        • Re: Speaking for victims of Nazism [was: Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blund... by
      • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by <>
        • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Michael W Cook <>
          • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by <>
      • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by John Cartmell <>
        • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "Vaughan Sanders" <>
          • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "fairthorne" <>
      • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Renia <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "Deborah Sharavi" <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "William Black" <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "Tony Hoskins" <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Gordon Banks <>
      • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
    • Re: Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Brant Gibbard <>
      • Re: Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "Peter Stewart" <>
        • Re: Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Brant Gibbard <>

  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by

    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? No Just human, thank goodness. by Tim Powys-Lybbe <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "D. Spencer Hines" <>
    • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by Renia <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "Tony Hoskins" <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "Tony Hoskins" <>
  • Re: British Royals -- Uniquely Blunder-Prone? by "Tony Hoskins" <>