GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2005-04 > 1113860014


From: Renia <>
Subject: Re: Sir Robert Wingfield 1382/8 was Gay Ancestry: Aline de Gay, wifeof Basset
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:33:34 +0300
References: <29.71602a26.2f944871@aol.com> <1113799543.061916.234780@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <00af01c543d8$158a28a0$c3b4fea9@email> <1113833497.874174.59080@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <012901c54441$7287e9c0$c3b4fea9@email> <1113850142.529126.265550@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1113850142.529126.265550@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>


Douglas Richardson wrote:

> Dear Leo ~
>
> Please stop blaming everyone else for your current troubles. Your
> problem isn't David Faris, or Douglas Richardson. Your problem is Leo
> van de Pas.
>
> Best always,


Really?

> Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
>
> Website: www.royalancestry.net
>
>
> "Leo van de Pas" wrote:
>
>>Apologies to all, I had hoped Richardson had some decency and brains
>
> and let
>
>>the matters rest, but it seems Richardson just can't help himself.
>
> That he
>
>>is morally bankrupt should be obvious by now. I did not make a
>
> blooper, I
>
>>recorded accurately what David Faris shows in Plantagenet Ancestry,
>>Seventeenth Century Colonists, First Edition Page 162.
>>
>>If anyone made a blooper it was David Faris. Richardson talks about
>
> polite
>
>>and collegial, let him start. On my website is clearly marked where
>
> the
>
>>information came from. If he wants to be insulting, he is insulting
>
> the
>
>>memory of David Faris, the man on whose back he is now making money.
>>Richardson how can you live with yourself?
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: <>
>>To: <>
>>Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 12:11 AM
>>Subject: Re: Sir Robert Wingfield 1382/8 was Gay Ancestry: Aline de
>
> Gay,
>
>>wife of Basset
>>
>>
>>
>>>Dear Leo ~
>>>
>>>I told you last week that I planned to review all of the online
>>>genealogical databases. I really did mean what I said. I've been
>>>planning this review for quite some time. You started out the
>
> process
>
>>>by calling me and all the newsgroup members names such as "fool,"
>>>"bloody fool," and "toadies." That wasn't very bright, Leo. You
>
> need
>
>>>to apologize to all of us and promise to stop name calling here on
>
> the
>
>>>newsgroup. I can't speak for anyone else but I know you hurt my
>>>feelings.
>>>
>>>As I stated earlier, I'm examining all of the genealogical
>
> databases
>
>>>for content and accuracy. So far, we've found significant problems
>>>with your database in both of these categories, and we've just
>>>scratched the surface. If this process is painful for you, I
>
> encourage
>
>>>to spend more time correcting your bloopers and less time
>
> collecting
>
>>>pictures of busty Raquel Welch. It doesn't take a rocket scientist
>
> to
>
>>>tell that you place way too much emphasis on shaky secondary
>
> sources
>
>>>such as Burke. In sharp contrast, you pay little or no attention
>
> to
>
>>>primary sources. This is no one's fault except your own.
>>>
>>>In sharp contrast, I just checked Jim Weber's genealogical database
>
> at
>
> http://worldconnect.genealogy.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=jweber&id=I11747.
>
>>>As I expected, he shows the correct parentage for Margaret
>
> Hastings,
>
>>>wife of John Wingfield and John Russell. Once again, Jim Weber's
>
> site
>
>>>has the correct information and you don't. Who's fault is this,
>
> Leo?
>
>>>Heavens, Leo, take some responsibility and stop whining and
>
> moaning.
>
>>>If Jim Weber can get it straight, so can you.
>>>
>>>I also checked Hal Bradley's great database just now. Just like
>
> Jim
>
>>>Weber, he also has Margaret Hastings' correct parentage listed.
>
> Hats
>
>>>off to both Jim and Hal. For those interested in Hal Bradley's
>
> site,
>
>>>one version of Hal's database can be found at the following web
>>>adddress:
>>>
>>>
>
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hwbradley/aqwg1243.htm#23040
>
>>>If all else fails, Leo, you can also find Margaret Hastings'
>
> correct
>
>>>parentage in your personal signed copy of my Plantagenet Ancestry
>
> book,
>
>>>pages 288 and 768. Instead of drooling over pictures of Raquel
>
> Welch
>
>>>this week, I invite you to spend some time reading my book. You
>
> might
>
>>>learn something, Leo, and that would be a very good thing. I cite
>
> all
>
>>>of my sources. Enjoy!
>>>
>>>Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
>>>
>>>Website: www.royalancestry.net
>>>
>
>

This thread: