GEN-MEDIEVAL-L ArchivesArchiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2005-11 > 1133205145
Subject: Re: King's Kinsfolk: Richard II's kinsman, Edmund Stafford
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 14:12:25 EST
In a message dated 11/28/05 10:36:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
<< Why should credence be attached to this secondary or tertiary work
(dated how many hundreds of years after the "facts" it alleges?) when
Visitations a mere 200 years removed are to be dismissed as
First there is no such thing as a tertiary source.
Second, it does not derive its information *from* a secondary source.
It states the link from the IPM
|Re: King's Kinsfolk: Richard II's kinsman, Edmund Stafford by|