GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2005-12 > 1133684170


From: "Douglas Richardson" <>
Subject: Re: The parentage of Orm Fitz Ketelteaser Reply
Date: 4 Dec 2005 00:16:10 -0800
References: <1133380317.339715.29050@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1133639886.788701.285590@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <956a2315c780eb5706462e26dff898d3@localhost.talkabouteducation.com> <dmtigu$i96$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>
In-Reply-To: <dmtigu$i96$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>


Todd A. Farmerie wrote:
>
> Everyone here seems to use Keats-Rohan as infallible when she supports
> their position, and ignore the parts that disagree.

> taf

Dear Todd ~

Perhaps you missed one of my posts.

I specifically stated I disagreed with Keats-Rohan regarding Ketel Fitz
Eldred being the father of Orm Fitz Ketel. I showed such a
relationship was impossible chronologically.

DR


This thread: