GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives
Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2005-12 > 1134427134
From:
Subject: Re: The parentage of (1094)potential answers
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:38:54 EST
In a message dated 12/12/05 2:00:57 PM Pacific Standard Time,
writes:
<< The comparison between the three
versions show MSS. C. to be invalid in any discussion of the witnesses. >>
But Kathleen Thompson suggested that MSS C was a confirmation. So could not
we discuss whether, in 1130, the list of "witnesses" made sense as people who
were confirming the original document? I believe that is what Emmett was
suggesting.
Will Johnson
This thread: