GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives
Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2006-03 > 1143741335
From: "Todd A. Farmerie" <>
Subject: Re: King's Kinsfolk: King William the Conqueror's kinsman, King EdwardtheConfessor
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:55:35 -0700
References: <e0gpv7$jvb$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu> <BAY106-F18960C413E18F752A84AB5D5D10@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BAY106-F18960C413E18F752A84AB5D5D10@phx.gbl>
Bob Turcott wrote:
>
>> Coats of arms did not develop until 2 generations later. The earliest
>> known arms date to Geoffrey Plantagenet, although when adopted,
>> sometimes multiple kinsmen of feudal underlings of the same lord
>> adopted similar arms. Any arms you find for the Conqueror and Peverel
>> will be unreliable.
>
> Give me a source as to why you would think anything found on william the
> conquer coats
> of arms would be unreliable on this royal subject. can you back this up?
>
Adrian Ailes, `The origins of the royal arms of England: their
development to 1199.', Reading Medieval Studies. Monographs 2(1982).
taf
This thread:
| Re: King's Kinsfolk: King William the Conqueror's kinsman, King EdwardtheConfessor by "Todd A. Farmerie" <> |