GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2006-05 > 1147692903


From: Renia <>
Subject: Re: C.P. Correction: Birthdate of Margaret Butler, wife of WilliamBoleyn, K.B.
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:35:03 +0300
References: <432.d865d8.3197869f@aol.com> <1147549570.417696.141070@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1147550087.717949.273150@d71g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1147550810.107729.180940@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1147551363.719623.253680@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <1147597153.369409.165110@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> <1147630256.771212.27500@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <4467A970.6020803@san.rr.com> <e48am2$3gu$1@mouse.otenet.gr> <4467EFCB.9000206@san.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <4467EFCB.9000206@san.rr.com>


norenxaq wrote:

> Renia wrote:
>
>> norenxaq wrote:
>>
>>> John Brandon wrote
>>>
>>>> I freely admit I'm very
>>>> bored by anything pre-1500 or so, but I have posted a lot of data that
>>>> helps people get further back from the 1500-1700 era ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> then why are you on a list whose primary focus is pre-1500?
>>
>>
>>
>> To my mind, as I've said before, the newsgroup's primary focus is not
>> pre-1500 genealogy,
>
>
>
> the name of this group, gen-medieval, would invalidate that interpretation
>
>> but American gateway genealogy. There should be a separate newsgroup
>> for that.
>
>
>
> no, if there is to be a separate list, it should be for gateway
> ancestors. NOT the mediaeval period

That's exactly what I said or meant.


This thread: