GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2006-10 > 1160515239


From:
Subject: Re: Kendal, Gospatric, Samlesbury
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:20:39 EDT


In a message dated 10/10/06 1:28:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
writes:

<< 49 & 49a are consistent with Thomas and Alan
FitzGospatric born in the range of 1130-1140. >>

I'm glad that you are in agreement that the Alan referred to in 49 is Thomas'
brother, not Thomas' son. That would cut the legs out of the idea that
Thomas here, is already necessarily an adult. And as has been pointed out, he
could be as young as 7, or some say 14 here.

Will


This thread: