GEN-MEDIEVAL-L ArchivesArchiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2007-05 > 1179316507
From: John Brandon <>
Subject: Re: Fw: Clues from Lists-Indexes, vol. 202 (Chanc. Proc. Supplement,Eliz. I)
Date: 16 May 2007 04:55:07 -0700
> I make no claim to speak for anyone else, unlike Brandon, but I
> imagine Leslie might not be entirely displeased to have it known by
> the newsgroup that he no longer (if he once did) cares to communicate
> privately with such a reprobate.
> Peter Stewart
He got a number of good benefits out of it, I think (being able to
boast a little to someone presumably interested about articles of his
coming out). On the other hand, even though he had personally
inspected the St. Katherine-by-Tower parish register on microfilm in
Salt Lake City, I wasn't allowed to know the exact wording of the
Gifford-Temple marriage record, because he was going to write it up in
a note to be published, along with some other marriages. Two years
later, I mildly ask about this and find out he's no longer doing it!
Once I asked for a copy of a short article from TAG--but no, that was
too much trouble.
So it was all very one-sided.
|Re: Fw: Clues from Lists-Indexes, vol. 202 (Chanc. Proc. Supplement,Eliz. I) by John Brandon <>|