GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives
Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2007-08 > 1186198827
From: WJhonson <>
Subject: Re: Famous medieval DNA - the Plantagenet project
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:40:27 -0700
References: <mailman.44.1185962129.31452.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>,<1185995710.722143.228160@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,<mailman.87.1186043658.31452.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com>,<1186165128.988261.164360@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,<1095.84.68.128.14.1186189110.squirrel@webmail.keele.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1095.84.68.128.14.1186189110.squirrel@webmail.keele.ac.uk>
<<In a message dated 08/03/07 17:59:15 Pacific Standard Time, writes:
In one
case, the finding that a Plant did not match the main Plant family
reinforced the idea that his surname traced back to an IGI record for an
unmarried mother. >>
------------------
Circular reasoning.
Will Johnson
This thread: