GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives
Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2007-09 > 1189244713
From: "a.spencer3" <>
Subject: Re: Duke of Buccleuch Dies
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:45:13 GMT
References: <1188922359.776640.75360@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com><1189109280.428002.179550@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com><LmZDi.311$YE3.666@eagle.america.net><46e0e321$0$5080$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr><ZRaEi.38114$ph7.13097@newsfe5-win.ntli.net><46e14d44$0$25927$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr><1QcEi.45712$S91.12211@newsfe7-win.ntli.net><46e166dd$0$27413$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr><ZOdEi.45940$rr5.30721@newsfe1-win.ntli.net><1189181488.457595.226800@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com><InfEi.51177$1G1.25809@newsfe2-win.ntli.net><4ohEi.6$FF5.265@eagle.america.net><1189195260.712915.101560@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com><WhiEi.10$FF5.124@eagle.america.net><1189196550.072687.296770@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com><RGiEi.12$FF5.100@eagle.america.net>
"D. Spencer Hines" <> wrote in message
news:RGiEi.12$...
> "Surreyman", like most broken-down Englishmen, with many frustrations,
wants
> to tie his lineage to a Noble, Royal or Retainer -- as in "Robert le
> Despenser".
>
> He wants to find such links for his own aggrandizement -- whereas I do it
> for the FUN of it -- realizing that such descents are available to
millions
> who are willing to do the tracing.
>
> TENS of MILLIONS of us are descended from William The Conqueror himself --
> so, making some silly-buggers statement about an invented Companion of the
> Conqueror is ludicrous -- but amusing -- and "Surreyman" provides Fair
> Entertainment -- although he's not a Top Banana, such as Stewart.
>
> Telling us about a "Robert le Despenser" that someone ELSE made up and
> trying to hook himself to it is just as bad as inventing a Companion of
the
> Conqueror himself.
>
>
I specifically said 'after' Hastings, and have already decried his attempts
at retrospectively becoming a 'companion'.
Read my posts.
Then, check some history.
Twit!
Surreyman
This thread:
| Re: Duke of Buccleuch Dies by "a.spencer3" <> |