GEN-MEDIEVAL-L ArchivesArchiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2007-09 > 1189276784
From: Bryn <>
Subject: Re: Who Really Came With William The Conqueror In 1066?
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 19:39:44 +0100
References: <BIoEi.17$FF5.firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com> <YZAEi.4$DU5.firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com> <REBEi.7$DU5.firstname.lastname@example.org>
In article <REBEi.7$>, D. Spencer Hines
>Do you give the same priority to an All-Female, Uterine, Line?...
>Which is even rarer.
>Admit it, McDonald...
>You are a First-Rate Male Chauvinist Pig -- born, bred and educated in
But still a McDonald...
>Lux et Veritas et Libertas
>"Doug McDonald" <> wrote in message
>> D. Spencer Hines wrote:
>>> Why is a "mixed-line" descendancy less desirable than an agnatic
>> Rarity! Why is a Michaelangelo oil painting worth more
>> than a Dali print?
>> Doug McDonald
Here's to you Jonathan Briley, not falling but flying.