GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives
Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2007-09 > 1189710504
From: "D. Spencer Hines" <>
Subject: Re: Maud de Camville's Daughter, Isabel de Vernon,Wife of Sir Richard de Sta...
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:08:24 +0100
References: <mailman.2210.1189617976.7287.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com><1189619728.638674.325130@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com><mailman.2213.1189629661.7287.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com><1189705649.285248.70540@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com><1189710233.138977.14800@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Hilarious!
Why can't DR cite his own book?
DSH
"taf" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Evidence is precisely what he has been asking for - the specific
> evidence that resulted in your concluding that Benedicta (or whatever
> you choose to call her) was a Ludlow. (And no, you cannot have
> concluded this based on your own book.)
>
> As to what he really needs, that is a much more existential question,
> but one which falls outside the purview of medieval genealogy.
>
> taf
This thread:
| Re: Maud de Camville's Daughter, Isabel de Vernon,Wife of Sir Richard de Sta... by "D. Spencer Hines" <> |