GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2008-02 > 1204345961


From: Douglas Richardson <>
Subject: Re: Sir John Cornwall - ?Lord Saint Amand?
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:32:41 -0800 (PST)
References: <72562bb7-fd39-402b-9c0c-20c11e50ad97@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com><9e9e5432-0e01-4c2a-854a-6222f358f741@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <c533d1d6-4ca3-4dce-bfcb-1606ee60ad5a@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <%G0yj.20774$421.16769@news-server.bigpond.net.au><2b76add5-0ee6-44ce-81da-24db37c64a56@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com><J54yj.20843$421.5056@news-server.bigpond.net.au>


On Feb 29, 8:30 pm, "Peter Stewart" <> wrote:

< O I see, and Richardson is of course following the well-known
convention of
< modern historians, trying to bamboozle readers into thinking he
knows more
< about it than anyone else.

Once again our enthusiastic poster has provided NO sources whatsoever,
and NO weblinks. This is a red flag, folks.

DR




This thread: