GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2009-01 > 1232148574


From:
Subject: Re: Sir John de Mowbray's kinswoman, Lady Clemence de Vesci
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:29:34 -0800 (PST)
References: <ee092182-2e99-4f67-80e0-d92bb05fa625@w1g2000prm.googlegroups.com><85811275-1bd5-488f-ad22-bd5f128a9b01@k1g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <405acda0-2b22-4b83-b4ee-f23f61e8cfad@35g2000pry.googlegroups.com> <54b0a010-749f-4341-a660-f7e2856cdc53@y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>


On Jan 16, 3:15 pm, Douglas Richardson <> wrote:
> On Jan 16, 4:00 pm, wrote:
>
>
>
> > So in two days the gentleman's name has changed to "Henri d'Avaugour"
> > and he has been demoted from his previous rank of count - he is no
> > longer "Count Henry of Avaugour" as you insistently called him earlier
> > in this thread.  So was it you that was wrong, or are you going to
> > blame John Carmi Parsons for this mistake, since you claimed him as an
> > authority for the previous version?
>
> No evidence, no citations, no weblinks = IGNORE.
>
> Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah

Okay, here are the weblinks to support the specific statements in this
post:

A) reference to "Count Henry of Avaugour" - 14 Jan 2009:
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/GEN-MEDIEVAL/2009-01/1231963949

B) Citation of John Carmi Parsons to support the above assertion - 14
Jan 2009:
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/GEN-MEDIEVAL/2009-01/1231982137

C) Revised identification as "Henri d'Avaugour" - 16 Jan 2009:
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/GEN-MEDIEVAL/2009-01/1232147735

Is this sufficient to jog your memory? So stop beating around the
bush and answer the question - or just admit that you were wrong the
first time.


This thread: