GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives
Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2009-05 > 1241629660
From:
Subject: Re: Armiger means Esquire
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
References: <d540afaa-1fe4-4328-bf5d-f8778f98a89a@d2g2000pra.googlegroups.com><mailman.1792.1241586286.2001.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com><4f894d57-2dc7-4e29-b9d3-382c303f2cb0@s38g2000prg.googlegroups.com><gtr92i$ip7$1@news.motzarella.org><ebd83571-cdcd-4ff6-aaad-4eb29d7c4375@f41g2000pra.googlegroups.com><gtrb4h$v3f$1@news.motzarella.org><f9e87a90-3e72-4cdd-949f-c2e533ed7f6b@z16g2000prd.googlegroups.com><gtrcra$be7$1@news.motzarella.org><1td205li041h5ce0dte7jcrvfmmpqgf19t@4ax.com> <35356f16-d73f-4a10-9baf-7f7534255031@n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <gts2aq$g70$3@news.motzarella.org><bc73e000-13d9-4c29-ba73-b255f0ec7f8e@g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>
On May 6, 8:00 am, ""
<> wrote:
< Can we go back to the beginning? The summons of 1296 (24 Edw. I)
makes
< a distinction between those addressed as 'Dominus' and those
addressed
< by name only. These latter are clearly knights since the summons is
a
< military summons and would have been to those holding by military
< service. So if those summoned by name must be knights, who are those
< summoned as 'Dominus'? They can ONLY be barons, there is no other
< explanation.
Post the entire list. Let's review it.
Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
This thread: