GEN-MEDIEVAL-L ArchivesArchiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2009-05 > 1241629660
Subject: Re: Armiger means Esquire
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
References: <email@example.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com><firstname.lastname@example.org>
On May 6, 8:00 am, ""
< Can we go back to the beginning? The summons of 1296 (24 Edw. I)
< a distinction between those addressed as 'Dominus' and those
< by name only. These latter are clearly knights since the summons is
< military summons and would have been to those holding by military
< service. So if those summoned by name must be knights, who are those
< summoned as 'Dominus'? They can ONLY be barons, there is no other
Post the entire list. Let's review it.
Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah