GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2009-05 > 1241688018


From: "" <>
Subject: Re: Armiger means Esquire
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
References: <d540afaa-1fe4-4328-bf5d-f8778f98a89a@d2g2000pra.googlegroups.com><mailman.1792.1241586286.2001.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com><4f894d57-2dc7-4e29-b9d3-382c303f2cb0@s38g2000prg.googlegroups.com><gtr92i$ip7$1@news.motzarella.org><ebd83571-cdcd-4ff6-aaad-4eb29d7c4375@f41g2000pra.googlegroups.com><gtrb4h$v3f$1@news.motzarella.org><f9e87a90-3e72-4cdd-949f-c2e533ed7f6b@z16g2000prd.googlegroups.com><gtrcra$be7$1@news.motzarella.org><1td205li041h5ce0dte7jcrvfmmpqgf19t@4ax.com> <35356f16-d73f-4a10-9baf-7f7534255031@n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <gts2aq$g70$3@news.motzarella.org><bc73e000-13d9-4c29-ba73-b255f0ec7f8e@g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com><0911038a-8d09-4494-b6f1-92b80acb4a3d@z16g2000prd.googlegroups.com>


On 6 May, 18:07, wrote:
> On May 6, 8:00 am, ""
>
> <> wrote:
>
> < Can we go back to the beginning? The summons of 1296 (24 Edw. I)
> makes
> < a distinction between those addressed as 'Dominus' and those
> addressed
> < by name only. These latter are clearly knights since the summons is
> a
> < military summons and would have been to those holding by military
> < service. So if those summoned by name must be knights, who are those
> < summoned as 'Dominus'? They can ONLY be barons, there is no other
> < explanation.
>
> Post the entire list.  Let's review it.
>
> Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah

The list is at:

http://www.peerage.org/genealogy/perceval_writ_24_edw_1.pdf

I would welcome your comments.



This thread: