GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2009-09 > 1252439185


From: Johnny Brananas <>
Subject: Re: SOURCES (FOR CUDWORTH ROYAL DESCENT)
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
References: <ee302ef3-b979-48c9-ad50-5fae57180fa1@y42g2000yqb.googlegroups.com><c93af6b5-e7ca-4f49-96d6-f12d3c357240@v36g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <a47ed77f-6905-493e-b6f4-0ef467ff55ca@j4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <c312e222-d7c8-46e5-9981-6e1cd848f6c3@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>


> I've read the Cudworth article by Paul C. Reed.  The line is good.
> You have to stop using secondary sources and visitations.  Reed goes
> for wills and other primary documents.
>
> Martin

Well, thanks, ... but I don't suppose I "have" to do anything.

One is permitted to try to work things out for oneself, if articles
promised for 10 - 20 years never materialize.

On the other hand, _you_ ought to stop ripping off other folk's
findings in your published articles. Or at least apologize properly
and sincerely without blaming the editor when there's no other way to
get out of it.


This thread: