GEN-MEDIEVAL-L ArchivesArchiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2010-02 > 1265077215
Subject: Re: Gilbert de Lacy
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:20:15 EST
In a message dated 1/28/2010 12:42:40 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> Hugh de Lacy, probably Gilbert's son, who married Rose de Monmouth.>>
I have to disagree with the opinion that this Hugh husband of Rohesia was
the same Hugh known to be a son of Gilbert.
Rather, we have no good source that leads us to that conclusion, and we do
have a good source, which tells us pointedly that Hugh died childless. So
he could not be the same person.
|Re: Gilbert de Lacy by|