GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

From:
Subject: Fwd: Roger de Montebegon
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:53:28 EDT

In a message dated 8/31/2010 7:35:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
writes:


> I think I can tell you the source of the claim that he died in 1245. It
> should probably be "bef 1246" as in that year the King took the homage of
> John, son and heir of Clementia "daughter of Thomas de Montbegon" (strike
> that) and sister (recte "half sister") and coheir of Roger de Montbegon.
>
> So if she was alread the co-heiress of her half-brother, and John was
> already her heir and she dead, then Roger had died before 1246.
>
> I presume that is the logic they used. Even though it's a bit scattered.
>
>

This thread:

• King John's grandson, Bishop Roger de Meulan, and the Bishop'sSeacourt connection by Douglas Richardson <>
  • Re: King John's grandson, Bishop Roger de Meulan, and the Bishop'sSeacourt connection by John <>
    • Re: King John's grandson, Bishop Roger de Meulan, and the Bishop'sSeacourt connection by Douglas Richardson <>
  • Re: King John's grandson, Bishop Roger de Meulan, and the Bishop'sSeacourt connection by Volucris <>
    • Re: King John's grandson, Bishop Roger de Meulan, and the Bishop'sSeacourt connection by Douglas Richardson <>
      • Re: King John's grandson, Bishop Roger de Meulan, and the Bishop'sSeacourt connection by Volucris <>
        • Roger de Montebegon by "Colin B. Withers" <>

          • Fwd: Roger de Montebegon by

      • Re: King John's grandson, Bishop Roger de Meulan, and the Bishop'sSeacourt connection by Douglas Richardson <>
        • Re: King John's grandson, Bishop Roger de Meulan, and the Bishop'sSeacourt connection by John Watson <>