GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives

Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2011-11 > 1320860316


From: "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
Subject: Re: Alwin I & Alwin II - the first hereditary Earls of Lennox
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:38:36 -0400
References: <mailman.18.1320638395.25922.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com><abfac004-83dd-4cb0-a2e2-3490e002cba6@v8g2000vbe.googlegroups.com><mailman.5.1320683166.31921.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com><6b4a20bd-965f-4d82-9a30-021956c3322e@f29g2000yqa.googlegroups.com><mailman.9.1320700384.31921.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com><9ff32245-86f5-4fa6-b826-d49f0ab8ed3e@4g2000yqu.googlegroups.com><mailman.1.1320765224.3772.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com><f60b7e6a-1ccf-4bdb-bfee-77bc25018137@m19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com><mailman.5.1320777141.3772.gen-medieval@rootsweb.com><df917494-9aaf-4e49-918e-ad9fa6389726@e15g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <df917494-9aaf-4e49-918e-ad9fa6389726@e15g2000vba.googlegroups.com>


Absolutely. I did not intend to be disrespectful. I
just wanted to be clear that I did not agree with
a couple of things you said. My apologies for
any offensive tone.

Peter


----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Maxwell Findlater" <>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: Alwin I & Alwin II - the first hereditary Earls of Lennox


On Nov 8, 6:32 pm, "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
wrote:
> No we are not agreed.

I am treating this as a courteous scholarly investigation - I don't
think that such an abrupt start to a post is in that spirit. I may
have made a mistake in thinking that we were agreed, and for that I am
sorry. However I wrote that with goodwill, hoping for consensus. I
am apologise.


This thread: