GENBOX-L Archives

Archiver > GENBOX > 2008-10 > 1224277018


From: Kathy <>
Subject: Re: [GENBOX] Wikipedia article on Genbox
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:58:00 -0500
References: <48F6BEF2.4030603@worldnet.att.net> <48F8D9C6.7070905@ceridwen.com><54cff9f00810171246h302c8212m4bf1977505f05272@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54cff9f00810171246h302c8212m4bf1977505f05272@mail.gmail.com>


Michel Vuijlsteke wrote:
> The same rules go for Deletion Review as for Articles for Deletion: rational
> arguments only, source all your statements, do not do any Original Research
> (e.g. "Genbox has the best database model of all genealogy programmes bar
> none"), Single Purpose Accounts (for the sole purpose of saying "I think
> Genbox is great and should stay!") are frowned upon, etc. etc. etc.

And you better mind your ps and qs because Michel will be watching to
make sure you don't engage in any "shenanigans" in your arguments.

This thread: