GENBRIT-L Archives
Archiver > GENBRIT > 2000-02 > 0949413543
From: "John Henley" <>
Subject: Re: St. Cath's.-Cross ref'd? Revisited.
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 13:59:03 -0000
Hi Art,
Each reference is to a page. On a page there are several marriage entries,
so more than two names.
Recalling your earlier post, I think I should go ahead with your Aylsham
John CUTTING - you will have a long search is the Bride is Miss Zeuss :-),
and as Mike Foster points out in his 'Comedy of Errors' there is always the
small chance the other name and reference is erroneous or missing!
Cheers
John Henley
researching
HENLEY, PARKER, PRENTICE, SECKER, RAPER, DURDEN
[London/Middx./Essex/Suffolk]
ROLFE, (O)RAFFERTY, EVANS, PARSONS, SYMONDS [Berks/Hants/Wilts]
HILL [Staffs/Cambs/Berks]
-----Original Message-----
From: akemp <>Date: 31 January 2000 21:39Subject: St.
Cath's.-Cross ref'd? Revisited.
>After the sage advice from the listers to my question 'Are the St.
>Caths. marriage entries cross-referenced?' I decided to plow through the
>records to find an entry that matched the record number of my John
>CUTTING, I was fortunate that I only had to read through to the B's ( of
>25 fiches) to find a match. The match showed that my John had married
>Thomas Bane...here we go again.
>Art in Florida.
>
>
>
This thread:
| Re: St. Cath's.-Cross ref'd? Revisited. by "John Henley" <> |