GENBRIT-L Archives

Archiver > GENBRIT > 2000-11 > 0973159297


From: "John Brown" <>
Subject: Re: OT: Charles I, II (and III?)
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 10:01:37 -0000


Can't disagree about Ann - she's the only one I'd give house room to, taking
care to keep Phil, Maggs and Andy well out of the way !

But isn't it time to get back to the true line of succession ? I read
somewhere (quite a time ago) that the true heir is Prince Albert of Bavaria
who is debarred by the 1701 Act of Settlement. Now we're talking about doing
away with the link between Crown and Church, shouldn't he (or his heirs) be
invited to take over ?

Cleverly manouevered back to genealogy :-)

John.

From: "d wilcox" <>
Subject: Re: OT: Charles I, II (and III?)


> >
> > As for Charles the Third or Jug Ears of the Remove ...Heaven forfend,
> > say I! Not wanted, not fit.
> >
> > Liz (Greenwich UK)
>
>
> Aaah he's not that bad. He might actually put some politicians in their
> places. Mind you Annie's the best man of the lot of 'em.
>
> Dw
>
> PS Can you imagine Anne, Phillip, Margaret and Andrew in one place???
>
>

This thread: