GENBRIT-L Archives
Archiver > GENBRIT > 2006-01 > 1137648993
From: Steve Hayes <>
Subject: Re: Most recent common ancestors
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:36:33 +0200
References: <1137338990.456458.231910@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <mo4ms15t5bs77ev0ds8bhs690882gdmb15@4ax.com> <1137393583.764351.82280@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <dqfnp4$11q$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk> <1137537283.462245.280940@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <dqk8dk$api$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk> <huuss15ojja0ida30hkla4racgf252j78d@4ax.com> <p00ts1l7610qcmjl77gkia2rbidafjcg1q@4ax.com> <87k6cx157v.fld@apaflo.com> <qukts1h4j9i5im2tcgvi7md6mqnuok3525@4ax.com>
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:57:50 -0500, Denis Beauregard <>
wrote:
>"Eskimo" is the term once given to Inuit by European explorers and is
>now rarely used in Canada. It is derived from an Algonquin term
>meaning "raw meat eaters," and many people find the term offensive.
>The term is still frequently used in the United States in reference to
>Inuit in Alaska.
Are there Inuit in Alaska?
But even if there are, not all Eskimos are Inuit.
--
Steve Hayes
E-mail: (see web page if it doesn't work)
Web: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734/stevesig.htm
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7783/
This thread:
| Re: Most recent common ancestors by Steve Hayes <> |