GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2000-11 > 0973887141
From: "Gregg Sayre" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] "Deep" ancestry
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:12:21 -0500
References: <6b.ba96902.273d7ede@aol.com>
How about "identifiable"?
Susan H. Sayre
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 11:39 AM
Subject: [DNA] "Deep" ancestry
> I believe I picked this phrase up from Oxford Ancestors, and I think it's
> pretty descriptive when we refer to our ancestors from thousands of years
> ago. But I can't think of a good antonym for more recent ancestors, the
ones
> of interest to us in a genealogical time frame. My dictionary only has one
> antonym -- "shallow" -- and that just doesn't cut it. "Recent" or "modern"
or
> "historical" might be better, but they're rather vague. Any ideas? Shall
we
> make up our own word?
>
>
> ==============================
> Visit Ancestry's Library - The best collection of family history
> learning and how-to articles on the Internet.
> http://www.ancestry.com/learn/library
>
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] "Deep" ancestry by "Gregg Sayre" <> |