GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2001-01 > 0980392483
From: Wanda Shepherd <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Using the mtDNA Concordance???
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 22:14:43 -0500
I'm new to the list, and fairly new to the idea of DNA testing. I was
wondering if it can tell if there are more genes of one family in your blood
than another. I never knew my birth father. If enough families take part, can
the test determine if I have the DNA of a certain family. I understand what I
read, just having trouble expressing what I mean, but maybe you get the
Al Bell wrote:
> Al Bell <> wrote:
> >> I know that Family Tree DNA will eventually develop a
> >> human family tree, with a red arrow pointing to "You are
> >> but I'm really impatient and want to know where I fit now.
> ><Lots of additional material I didn't quite follow is
> >Note to Alan Savin and Orin Wells: This is the kind of thing
> >I had in mind when I wondered if what happens will be
> >genealogy or some other discipline. How say you now? <g>
> I recognize that you have some valid points about the hype surrounding DNA
> testing. But I also think your response shows a definite lack of charity,
> and an extreme lack of ability to recognize "exaggeration for purposes of
> Of course, Family Tree DNA is NOT going to send me a family tree of all
> 100 billion human beings who ever lived with a red arrow pointing to "You
> Are Here." That's a joke.
> On the other hand, even though the cheap, primitive kind of mtDNA test I
> purchased can't tell me whether another person is my close matrilineal
> relative, it can tell me whether another person is NOT my close
> matrilineal relative.
> In conjunction with a really good tree based on tens of thousands of DNA
> tests, my results can also give me a vague idea of where my matrilineal
> ancestors were when my pattern of mtDNA substitutions formed. It sounds,
> for example, as if group D, which might be my group, formed around 20,000
> to 50,000 years ago in central Asia or northern Asia. Maybe my particular
> subtype split off between 5,000 and 15,000 years ago somewhere around
> Turkey or Georgia. No, that's not genealogy, but I think it's really
> interesting anthropology.
> Of course, the current tests are slow and primitive. Once the testing
> process is more automated, the kinds of cheap tests I can afford will
> probably give more precise results.
> a.l. bell
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:23:32 EST
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Using the mtDNA Concordance???
> In a message dated 1/23/2001 1:19:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> >There is a fairly extensive table that assigns some haplotypes to
> >haplogroups A, D, etc. at
> The Macaulay site is a WONDERFUL site for anyone interested in the
> details of DNA testing.
> >So I'd the general result (Causcasian) is next to useless, but the
> >specific result could be very informative if you wanted to test a
> >hypothesis about matrilineal relatives or encountered someone else with
> >the same haplotype.
> The truth is, this is about all most people can do with the kinds of
> primitive mtDNA tests now on the market, anyway.
> If, say, one out of 100,000 people has my exact mtDNA Family Tree DNA test
> haplotype, then as many as 50,000 other living people may have the same
> haplotype -- and I have a fairly rare haplotype.
> On the other hand, if someone out there is wondering, "Should I spend the
> money to get the test?" I would say, "Go for it, if you can afford it,"
> because I think having your own personal test results in your hands is a
> very educational experience. Also, the more results the testing companies
> have, the better the trees will be.
> a.l. bell
> The easiest way to stay in touch with your family and friends!
|Re: [DNA] Using the mtDNA Concordance??? by Wanda Shepherd <>|