GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2001-09 > 0999430161


From: "Earl Beaty" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Which generation to pick?
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 05:29:21 -0600
References: <2449F3F867FBD211936600C04F68569EA3C510@smhrimsx.mhri.med.umich.edu>


Gregg,

It is an interesting question. Here are my thoughts.

Your primary objective is to sort out the five brothers. That is apt to be
a difficult task, possibly requiring a favorable roll of the dice. Doing
the test on grandson rather than grandpa risks a disrupting mutation,
without contributing much value. A mutation since grandpa would be not very
useful because it hasn't been inherited enough times, and you wouldn't know
it was recent. You surely have other better ways to get information about
the last three generations. Discovering a non-paternity event is recent
generations might be interesting, but it would certainly interfere with your
primary mission.

I would adapt the strategy most likely to resolve the three brothers
question.

Best wishes,
--Earl
Colorado USA


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bonner, Gregg" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 1:22 AM
Subject: [DNA] Which generation to pick?


> Dear Project[e|o]rs,
>
> I think I am about to embark on a (mostly) Y-Chromosome study for the
> surname LENTZ (Lence Lance Lantz etc.).
>
> There are four (or maybe 5) putative brothers. Two are known to be
brothers,
> and the other 2 are likely brothers with each other, but unknown
> relationship to the first brother pair.
>
> We want to pick some good representatives for the lines. My question is
> this:
>
> Given a choice between choosing a Lentz of whatever line from a most
recent
> generation, versus his grandpa Lentz, say, which should I choose?
>
> I realize that by picking grandpa, that eliminates some possible
> non-paternity events. But I suspect there may be some trade-off. For
> example, I can imagine that there might be some information to be had by
> maximizing generations, viz., secondary and internal information related
to
> shared mutations among the (perhaps later) participants.
>
> I would appreciate input from anyone who has considered this issue/choice.

>
> Cheers,
>
> Gregg
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Ancestry.com Genealogical Databases
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist2.asp
> Search over 2500 databases with one easy query!
>


This thread: