GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: [DNA] St. Petersburg Times article
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 10:54:21 EST

In a message dated 12/14/01 10:20:41 PM Pacific Standard Time,
writes:


> For this new
> test, the purported common male ancestor is two generations further back
> than that of the previous test, so the margin for error is increased. But
> these results may help solidify the previous results, or may reveal
> an(other) flaw(s) in the purported lines of descent.
>

Going back two generations is a good idea. A mismatch in your situation
reminds me of that saying "A man with one watch knows what time it is. A man
with two watches is never sure."

This thread:

• [DNA] St. Petersburg Times article by
  • RE: [DNA] St. Petersburg Times article by "John C. Carter" <>

  • Re: [DNA] St. Petersburg Times article by

  • RE: [DNA] St. Petersburg Times article by "John C. Carter" <>