GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2002-03 > 1015138000


From: "Allan S. Gleason" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] FTDNA test results
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 23:46:45 -0700
References: <35.22dd26a1.29b2bdd7@aol.com>


Let the games begin! So now we have a semblance of compatibility between FTDNA and
Relative Genetics at least in the first 12 markers. However, the expansion markers
used by FTDNA and those yet to be named? markers from Relative Genetics are not
comparable at least so far as I know. Is there anyone out there who knows if Rel.
Gen's markers have been given DYS titles and if so, what they might be?
Allan
.

wrote:

> Hello Everyone,
>
> I just received the results of my upgrade from 12 to 21 markers from Family
> Tree DNA. Wanted to share the results. Here they are:
>
> DYS393=13
> DYS390=24
> DYS19=14
> DYS391=11
> DYS385a=11
> DYS385b=14
> DYS426=12
> DYS388=12
> DYS439=12
> DYS389-1=13
> DYS392=13
> DYS389-2=29
> DYS458=17
> DYS459a=9
> DYS459b=9
> DYS455=11
> DYS454=11
> DYS447=25
> DYS437=15
> DYS448=19
> DYS449=30
>
> Steve Etheridge
>
> ==============================
> To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to:
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237

This thread: