GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2002-03 > 1017170351


From: "Andrea & Len" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA]
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:19:17 -0500
References: <001b01c1d46a$32162ae0$01304741@bennett> <002601c1d4c7$ee258020$6601a8c0@home> <001e01c1d4ed$2ecfea00$79b18690@mashirley>


unsubscribe!!!!!! Please
----- Original Message -----
From: "margaret (nee SHIRLEY)" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:39 PM
Subject: [DNA]


> unsubscribe
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aubrey Mitchell" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Interpretation of DNA-Mitchell
>
>
> > 'preciate, but 'fraid this southern boy has do idea what that means.
> > Assume, of the data collected thus far, my markers are "unique". Got
the
> > permission of the group coordinator to use the other numbers with no
name
> > attribution. Will take a while as the list I have only list the FTDNA
> Locus
> > numbers and I'm not to comfortable with my accuracy at the conversion.
> > ___________
> > This message has been checked by Norton AntiVirus 2002
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bennett Greenspan" <>
> > To: <>
> > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 7:01 PM
> > Subject: RE: [DNA] Interpretation of DNA-Mitchell
> >
> >
> > > Howdy Ya'll
> > >
> > > After seeing that Ann hadn't found any matches for Mr. Mitchell at
YSTR
> > > I looked at the FTDNA database of Recent Ethnic Origins (REO).
> > >
> > > No matches.
> > >
> > > I then used the stepwise comparison model to compare between our 3900
> > > unique 12 marker haplotypes in the REO at 'steps' from the sample. I
> > > found 1 sample at 4 steps.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > >
> > > Bennett Greenspan
> > > President
> > > http://www.FamilyTreeDNA.com
> > >
> > > The World's only website dedicated to Genealogy by Genetics
> > >
> > > "History Unearthed Daily"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [mailto:]
> > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:44 PM
> > > To:
> > > Subject: Re: [DNA] Interpretation of DNA
> > >
> > > In a message dated 03/24/02 2:56:55 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> > > writes:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Locus DYS# Scores Alleles
> > > > #1 393 4 12
> > > > #2 390 7 23
> > > > #3 19 5 14
> > > > #4 391 5 10
> > > > #5 385a 7 13
> > > > #6 385b 7 13
> > > > #7 426 4 11
> > > > #8 388 7 15
> > > > #9 439 4 12
> > > > #10 389-1 6 14
> > > > #11 392 6 12
> > > > #12 389-2 7 31
> > > > #13 458 8 15
> > > > #14 459a 7 9
> > > > #15 459b 7 9
> > > > #16 455 7 11
> > > > #17 454 8 11
> > > > #18 447 10 26
> > > > #19 437 8 15
> > > > #20 448 9 20
> > > > #21 449 13 33
> > > >
> > >
> > > These don't come up with any matches at all in the US or European
> > > forensic
> > > databases at http://ystr.org/europe. Just out of curiosity, have you
> > > checked
> > > your results in the ethnic database at Family Tree DNA?
> > >
> > >
> > > ==============================
> > > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy
> > > records, go to:
> > > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237
> > >
> > > ______________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > ==============================
> > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy
records,
> go to:
> > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237
> >
>
>
> ==============================
> To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records,
go to:
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237
>


This thread: