GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2002-04 > 1019375087


From: "Orin R. Wells" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Relative Genetics/Ancestry.com results
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:45:47 -0800
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020420201235.051a22b0@wells.org>
In-Reply-To: <3CC267A2.D84B1A8F@route66web.com>


At 12:17 AM 4/21/02 -0700, Allan S. Gleason wrote:
>I hope you didn't miss Gary Blakely's comparison between FTDNA, OA, and
>Ancestry!
>That is a keeper for certain!

As a matter of fact it did slip by me when I was busy. But I went back and
looked it up. Apparently they provided Gary with an explanation which was:
"There are 4 loci that Ancestry/Relative Genetics does not have CEPH
calibration finished and are noted with letters instead of repeat numbers"

It sounds like they got stampeded into shipping before they were really
ready, doesn't it?


This thread: