GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2002-11 > 1036447936


From: John German <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] DYS Numbers and Mutations
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:12:20 -0500
References: <JCHBN.021104.143130.RC0@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>


Can anyone explain (or even speculate) WHY the 464 markers were chosen
by FTDNA for its extended offering? Is there anything about them that
makes the 464s superior to the markers used by other services?

This thread: