GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2003-02 > 1044473602


From: "Pieter J. Cramwinckel" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] mutations and paper trail
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:41:38 +0100
References: <00d301c2cd30$0dbb53e0$ae1ffea9@vaio> <008401c2cd36$bd5fdea0$b60b22d0@0020034528> <003801c2cd49$da31d200$5592fea9@emucf>


How strange that I did not receive Nel Hatcher posting to this list...did someone else experience that too ? it is not the first time that I feel some postings do not arrive in my box, but replies to them do.
But thanks anyway for posting and quoting this 5 mutation deviation in a proven genealogy.
It supports my point that more frequent mutations do occur.
I wonder wether Nel has made a pylogenetic chart..it might help to viualize the problem.

Pieter J. Cramwinckel
WebRing Master DNA Surname Projects :
http://j.webring.com/hub?ring=dnasurnameprojec
Cramwinckel genealogy http://www.cramwinckel.info
Kraejonwinkela project:C/Kr..winkel research)
http://www.kraejonwinkila.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Kenneth V. Graves
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] mutations and paper trail


Nel Hatcher wrote:
<You can add me to the list of those with concerns about the 2 mutation
limit. If you look at our results at
http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nhatcher/DNAtest.htm you will see the 4 tests
for John/Eve. I feel test 5774 is our baseline result for this group. This
is a family with a very solid paper trail to the William Hatcher group (in
yellow) yet we have a 5 mutation difference compared to test 4781 & 5893.>
<cut>
Kenneth V. Graves
wrote :
>In looking at the Hatcher DNA results, I see that the families are mostly in
the southern U.S. (VA & SC).>
>cut>

This thread: