GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2003-02 > 1044561720


From: "John F. Chandler" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] mutations and paper trail
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 15:02 EST
In-Reply-To: orinwells@wells.org message <5.1.1.6.0.20030206073723.05f69a30@wells.org> of Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:55:02 -0700


Orin wrote:
> For what it is worth, Relative Genetics is using a higher number of 0.003

Note that RelGen was using 0.004 last year and hotly defending it. It
was said to be based on "in-house" (i.e., never published) data. I have
to wonder what the standard deviation was for the old estimate and what
it is now for the new one...

John Chandler


This thread: