GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2003-04 > 1049354538
From: "Mitzi Bateman" <>
Subject: Was [DNA] Ancestryby DNA; now Dangling Participles
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 23:35:06 -0800
References: <20030402203127.25253.qmail@web41207.mail.yahoo.com>
This is a NAR post; but the teacher in me couldn't let it slide. <G>
David wrote:
>Are there a few great great grandparents (for example) who are unaccounted
for
>(regret the dangling participle).
There is no dangling participle in the above sentence. Did I miss
something, or are you referring to the fact that the sentence ends in a
preposition?
Mitzi who knows much more about dangling participles than DNA : )
(We're all ignorant, just in different areas.)
This thread:
| Was [DNA] Ancestryby DNA; now Dangling Participles by "Mitzi Bateman" <> |