GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2003-05 > 1051854380


From: (Thomas Breckenridge)
Subject: [DNA] Blonde Indians
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 01:46:20 -0400 (EDT)


Listmembers:

I promised not to post any more messages to the list concerning "blonde
Indians." Read the following message I just received and you'll see why
I have to send one more. I have nothing further to say on this subject,
except that I don't understand the silence of people who should know
better than to allow this silliness to continue unanswered. Friends:
This is a no-brainer that's turning into an "Emperor's New Clothes" kind
of thing. THERE ARE NO BLONDE-HAIRED, FAIR-SKINNED, "FULL-BLOODED"
AMERICAN INDIANS!

From:
Date: Fri, May 2, 2003, 12:35am
To:
Subject: Re: Blonde Indians

In a message dated 5/1/03 9:29:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
(Thomas Breckenridge) writes:

>I promised to keep off list with this subject, >and so I shall.

>You are correct about the beginning of the >thread. It was a later
post that specifed a >"blonde-haired, blue-eyed Cherokee." >However, my
opinion on the matter remains >the same.

Oh yes, you are critical in public and admit your mistakes in private.
Lists are full of people like you.

Grant

So, Grant... There's your "public apology"--regarding an insignificant
point in this discussion.

Tom B.

This thread: