GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2003-06 > 1055429237


From: Charles <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] genotypes.xls and DNAPrint Marker #1111 and the Duffy-Null trait
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:47:46 -0400
References: <20030612072358.20941.qmail@web41214.mail.yahoo.com>


David,

Thank you for mentioning my DNAPrint Test Results Log Book but I wish to
point out that my last name is spelled Kerchner, not Kirchner. It was
probably a typo on your part but I did want to clarify it for the
newbies.

For those who have new results who want to add those results to the
DNAPrint Test Results Log, here is the link to read and add results to
the log:

Read: http://www.kerchner.com/cgi-kerchner/dnaprint.cgi

Add: http://www.kerchner.com/dnaprint.htm

Charles


David Faux wrote:
>
> Ray et al.
>
> I realize that some people see it as their mission in life to continually chip away at the foundations of the DNAPrint test in an apparent attempt to ensure its demise. If the DNAPrint test should be discarded, then I guess we will have to bid adieu to mitochondrial DNA testing.
>
> First, it is unclear what Dana means in her posting and we need to wait for her to offer an explanation. Secondly, I suggest all those interested to check out Charles Kirchner's DNAPrint Test Results Log Book. One of the early submissions was from Dana who indicated that while her 17% African finding was somewhat surprising, both her brother and a maternal cousin were found to have African mtDNA.
>
> David.
>
> Raymond Whritenour <> wrote:
> Dana Schmutz:
>
> WAIT A MINUTE! Are you telling us that your first DNAPrint 2.0 test
> results gave you a minority ancestry of 17% Sub-Saharan African, and NOW
> you're 100% Indo-European? How did that happen? Was there a lab error,
> or did you have a second test--or what? We haven't seen the like of
> this, yet!
>
> Ray Whritenour
>
> Dr. David K. Faux, P.O. Box 192, Seal Beach, CA, 90740, USA
>
>
>
>

This thread: