GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2003-06 > 1055478165


From: David Faux <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] DNA Print
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 21:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9C153D0B6A83DC4FA49E468EF360C7F5EC1C@ivey3.ivey-ivie-ivy.net>


Dang. Those of us who live along the concrete water courses amidst the mean streets of LA still have 40 minutes to wait before we can enter the debate.

David.

"Jerry L. Ivey" <> wrote:
I thought the report was misleading to viewers. I will acknowledge that
the DNAPrint test was valuable in showing a majority African ancestry of
the suspect. However, there was an unstated implication that it was also
the DNAPrint test used for the actual DNA matching of the person
arrested and the crime scene samples.

This is not intended as a criticism of Tony or AncestryByDNA of course,
but rather of the shoddy nature of "reporting" on such shows.




Dr. David K. Faux, P.O. Box 192, Seal Beach, CA, 90740, USA




This thread: