GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: [DNA] Re: Picts had matrilinear royal decent through mtDNA
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 19:49:47 EDT

Roughly yes, but Danelaw was a lot more complicated than this and is not to
be related to Danegeld and the problems of Ethelred Unread (the Unready). We
also had Kings such as Cnut who were from Scandanavia. The English succession
was not a simple primogeniture system as we have now and Harold Godwainson was
not the Atheling in 1066 although he became King then.
John Clare

This thread:

• [DNA] Picts had matrilinear royal descent through mtDNA by "Sarah Jordan" <>
  • Re: [DNA] Picts had matrilinear royal descent through mtDNA by David Faux <>
    • Re: [DNA] Picts had matrilinear royal descent through mtDNA by "Palden" <>
      • Re: [DNA] Picts had matrilinear royal descent through mtDNA by David Faux <>
        • Re: [DNA] Picts had matrilinear royal descent through mtDNA by "Palden" <>
          • Re: [DNA] Picts had matrilinear royal descent through mtDNA by David Faux <>
            • [DNA] I Found Tony Fudakis's Original Case Study Results by "Cecelia Clancy" <>
              • Re: [DNA] I Found Tony Fudakis's Original Case Study Results by "Padre Oquendo" <>
                • [DNA] ANNOUNCING: CREAGER/KRIEGER, etc. Y-DNA PROJECT by "Audrey Shields Hancock" <>
              • RE: [DNA] I Found Tony Fudakis's Original Case Study Results by "ernest hurst" <>
                • Re: [DNA] An idea! Why not reprocess the genotype data with the new algorithm for each prior customer's test data instead of a complete new retest? by Charles <>
  • [DNA] Re: Picts had matrilinear royal decent through mtDNA by (Wayne George)
  • Re: [DNA] Re: Picts had matrilinear royal decent through mtDNA by
    • Re: [DNA] Re: Picts had matrilinear royal decent through mtDNA by "Palden" <>

  • Re: [DNA] Re: Picts had matrilinear royal decent through mtDNA by